In my mind, Emily Dickinson’s
poetry is definitely simply deceptive. If I were to write poetry that was eight
lines long, there is no way it would ever be taught in an American Literature
classroom years later. Emily Dickinson, however, was able to write poetry that
allows each student in our class to speak for five minutes on one poem alone.
There needs to be a lot packed in to each poem for that to be a possibility.
Each poem has different interpretations and meanings with each line.
Even
though there are multiple meanings and interpretations, each poem is relatively
easy to read. There are not many words that will trip you up. When Dickinson is
assigned for a class, you can feel the entire class exhale with relief. The
poems are easy and fun. If someone wants to read them simply for enjoyment, I think
that it is possible. You can read Emily Dickinson without diving in to the depths
of every single meaning. That is why she is simply deceptive. Her simple style
and short poems and easy rhyme schemes could lead her readers to believe that
her poetry is not all that deep. However, when you dive into her poems, you see
how deep they really are. Dickinson includes allusions from mythology and
geography. She also likes to throw in a capitol letter in places they should
not be. I don’t know what her reasoning is for this, but multiple teachers and
professors have been unable to answer me when I ask about it, so I would have
to say she is being deceptive. I don’t think it really matters if you think
Emily Dickinson is simply deceptive or deceptively simple. Either way you
decide to read her poems is a way to enjoy her poetry and learn from it.